Amongst the yearly Plone events of the calendar, the Plone Open Garden is well stablished and one of the most importants. This year’s edition was awesome thanks again to the great work and hosting from Abstract. Thank you guys for this great event!
Albert Casado, Ramon Navarro and myself had a well defined objective during PLOG: Finish the Plone 5 default theme (Barceloneta). We want to thank again to our kind sponsors that participated in the chipin that allowed us to attend PLOG doing this amazing job. We had long talks with other PLOG attendants regarding the new theme and got lots of inputs and thoughts about it.
We started the refining and polishment of the new Plone toolbar. We’ve been working in a first responsive version of it and in the dynamic positioning feature. The user will be able to position the toolbar (side/side expanded/top) and will be replaced by a sliding right off-canvas version on small screens.
We also integrated the document “byline” viewlet into a section of the toolbar and re-styled it. The current toolbar version obey to the legacy order of things in Plone (contentViews, contentActions, etc), however we are still working in an improved version of the toolbar because of some of the inputs we’ve received from people. These changes are mainly usability concerns for reagrouping and reorder menus, simplify markup, and clean some parts. You can find some mockups below that will be discussed by the UI and framework team.
Modernize the markup
One of the concerns of the people (Albert’s and mine too) was that Plone have lots of outdated pieces of HTML markup here and there. They need to be updated, cleaned and simplified. This will give us the ability of make future themes more simpler and will result in less Diazo rules to apply. It should not be difficult to document all the changes and make them available as reference. The new theme should also include all the accessibility and ARIA roles in place.
Complete and polish CSS
We worked hard also on polish and fix missing CSS. There are still some parts of Plone that are under-styled (e.g. Control Panel) but we will address it as soon as we will decide if the improvements studied in Emerald Sprint will be addressed or not. We improved some parts of the styling of the structure pattern (folder_contents) and the modals which are already using the modal pattern.
We have to admit that we thought that we should be able to end the job within the 4 days of PLOG. Many things has been done, but there are still lots of things to do and to address. We will continue the work on the theme and we will finish the toolbar and the general CSS soon. Of course, any help will be appreciated. We are also working on document as good as possible with a list of remaining things in order to make easy people jump in and help with them. So if you want to help, please contact us!
To @datakurre @davisagli @franklinkingma @roelbruggink @fourdigits @abstractsrl and all other donors.
I’m back at home after an awesome week sprinting on plone.org reboot project and Plone 5. The organization was amazing, thanks to Timo (@timostollenwerk) to make it so perfect. I want to thank to the Plone Foundation and GfU Cyrus AG (@schulungen) for sponsoring the event and specially thanks to my employer, UPCnet for allowing me to attend.
I was mainly focused in working for the reboot of plone.org site. We decided that we should finally will go for an initial launch on Plone 4.3, taking care of doing things right for ease an (eventual) future migration to Plone 5. We also wanted to use the same approach when using technologies than the ones used in the new Plone 5 theme: plonetheme.barceloneta.
Keeping this in mind, we are using the latest implementation of p.a.contenttypes, p.a.event, p.a.z3cforms and wildcard.foldercontents. We also wanted to integrate p.a.widgets into the project, but we’ve found that the current state of it (specially under Plone 4.3) was a bit unmature yet and we’ve hold it up until we will have a more stable version (which, after the sprint, it’s near to be ready!). We will try to include it as soon as we can.
The first two days we worked on make the theme look shiny, make it usable and put some pixel loving into it. As Barceloneta, we are using Bootstrap 3.1 and LESS to build the theme. We are using as much as possible the new feature of LESS 1.6.x series, import by reference, in order to keep CSS duplication as low as possible.
On wednesday I did an initial implementation of the new contributor profile pages as Carsten Senger (@csenger) started to work on the stats data retrieval engine. It will have the inital form of a nightly run script that will retrieve data from different sources (GitHub, StackOverflow, Gmane) for later show in the contributor profile. We already have a working version of the engine, as we will continue improving it and add new data sources.
For the member profile we did an initial implementation extending the user schema using the brand new p.a.users based on z3c.forms and using that data to feed the profile pages.
Asko Soukka (@datakurre) helped me to setup the ploneorg buildout for make plone.themepreview work for it. I have to way that he did an amazing job with Robot Framework and it’s a tool that every Plone project should have.
We had an open space for debating how the products page will be in the new plone.org site. We decided that we will get rid of the unmantained and bloated Products.PloneSoftwareCenter and siblings. We want a more lightweight and simple add-on product catalog powered with Dexterity that will have a reduced amount of metadata compared with the PSC one. The whole add-on products section will be powered by a faceted navigation. The add-ons releases will no longer be hosted in plone.org (PyPi server feature) as there is no point to have it twice in PyPi and in the site.
We will put in place a way for award add-on products with a “certified” badge. It will work based on the accomplishments of the product. There is already a list of best practices when developing an add-on product, like having an uninstall profile, have translations, etc. People will be able to send for review their add-on as they think it passes all requirements.
We will also reboot all the information for that catalog and no migration will be done. This will ensure that product owners will update the information for the products which are still maintained and alive in the catalog. Issue trackers (Poi) will also be deprecated too as there are plenty of tools out there (eg. GitHub issue tracker) that do the job more efficiently than it does.
On thursday I worked on making eea.facetednavigation and collective.cover play nicely with BS3.1. We will use c.cover to have a flexible layout on the home page and (potential) subhomes.
Unfortunately, we had no time to work on the home page tiles, but we will in the next weeks. Albert Casado (@albertcasado), who is the responsible for the new shiny Plone 5 toolbar and who did a terrific job on Barceloneta theme during the sprint will help me with that and to polish the theme itself.
As soon as possible we will have a demo site for you to see, I’ll keep you posted.
Situation: You open a project in SublimeText2 with lots of files (e.g a buildout folder). At some point, ST2 stops showing you the contents of a folder (probably because of the lots of files it has to handle).
You’ve been there, I’ve been there. And it sucks.
The common solution is to use the “Project” menu “refresh folders” option or if you have the SideBarEnhancements plugin, use the “Refresh” option of the contextual menu.
Another option, you can set a new key binding to the refresh command like:
Updated 15/06/2013: The pcre brew recipe has been updated to PCRE 8.32 and Nginx now compiles with no hassle.
I’ve been experiencing some extrange behavior since I’ve updated to ML recently. NGINX stop compiling correctly throwing the following error:
$ make -f objs/Makefile cd /opt/local/lib \ && if [ -f Makefile ]; then make distclean; fi \ && CC="gcc" CFLAGS="-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe " \ ./configure --disable-shared /bin/sh: ./configure: No such file or directory make: *** [/opt/local/lib/Makefile] Error 127 make: *** [build] Error 2
It’s an error related with the PCRE library shiped with ML. We need to provide a brand new PCRE distribution:
Today the Genweb project turns 5. I’m aware that I should have done this write up much more earlier because a formal introduction of the project to the community was never done due to a lot of reasons. I really think I’m in debt with the Plone community and I want to return some of the vast amount of knowledge the community provided to me. Now I think that the better way to do it is to share the knowledge from this 5 years with Genweb.
Genweb (as its name hints) is a institutional web generator. The project was born as an initiative from the Communication and Promotion Service at the BarcelonaTech University (UPC) and sponsored by the university itself. Genweb was created with two goals in mind: Provide the university community a content management tool suitable to all audiences (speaking in terms of usability) and unify the look and feel of the university web sites.
Genweb, “the infrastructure”
I will talk in later posts about Genweb “the application”, suffice it to say that through the years it was Plone 2 and 3 based and now it’s Plone 4.1 based coupled with some the most popular Plone add-ons (Dexterity, PloneFormGen, Collage, etc…) and some additional tweaks for further improve the already awesome Plone usability.
Today I want to focus in Genweb “the infrastructure” which I think is by far our best accomplishment. During the project’s 5 years of life you could say it’s been quite a success. The project is currently hosting almost 400 Plone sites, which it’s a growth rate of 80 site per year. Design the infrastructure for hosting 400 plone sites is a big challenge, so we had to make it evolve constantly and adapt it to its constant growing requirements. It started from a single physical server to the six physical server architecture that host the full system at present.
This is the actual hardware architecture of the system today:
It’s a six physical machine based system. The system specs of each server are different, depending on their role. For example, each frontend has 32GB RAM and dual quad-core CPUs. With such horse power we’ve designed an architecture that is capable to take full advantage of the machines. We have split the service in 12 twin environments.
These are the components of each environment:
Requests for each environment has the same entry point at the Pre-frontend machine which host the HTTP cache accelerators (Varnish) processes and the routing and load balancing (HAProxy) to the Frontend servers (A, B and C).
The request is processed (if not cached) by one of the tree Zope Clients. Each environment has three Zope clients each of them assigned to one Frontend machine. With this setup we have the pipeline balanced and fault tolerant at the frontend level.
The Zope clients attack a ZEO server located in one of the Backend servers. This ZEO has 35 Plone sites (Genwebs instances) at most. Each instance has its own ZODB mountpoint in its ZEO server for easy management (backup and restore procedures), easy file size handling and mental sanity. This ends up in having a ZODB database for each instance.
Design decisions, drawbacks and solutions
As I said, we had to adapt the system architecture through the years. We wanted to keep it bleeding edge, by implementing some of the most recent additions and features as they emerged from the community. Genweb implemented the first beta versions of plone.app.blob, this helped us to lower the sites database size by storing the images and files out of the ZODB.
Having a ZODB for each instance was a good decision, but we’ve had to face an important drawback. The system begun to lost connections due to reach the file descriptor (FD) limit of the backend because each ZODB mountpoint uses 4 sockets to connect with each Zope client. We had three clients accessing to each mountpoint, so this means that the limit of 1024 FDs by process was easily reached. After changing the libc6 hard limit, a recompilation of Python and Zope and change the default system FD limit the problem was solved. However, this was only valid for a short space of time, because we found that the ZEO server process have a lot of trouble in handling great numbers of open sockets. After some testing we found that staying arround 35 mountpoints for each ZEO server was the safest and best performance setup.
So we split the whole setup in 12 twin enviroments with 35 instances each at most.
We used buildout since the very beginning. We used a script to equally distribute the instances between enviroments. Since the split, we formalized this script converting it to a buildout recipe.
The recipe basically extends the zope.conf and zeo.conf files of each Zope client and ZEO server with a list of instances for each of them. This list can be a remote endpoint via http or a file in the filesystem.
These are the production buildouts of the project:
Probably, each of these tools itself won’t be useful for direct use for you because they are very specific for our use case, but you can extract some pieces of them for your own profit.
Summary and some numbers
As a conclusion, we are currently serving more than 3M pages/month with a transfer of 200GB/month. There are 12 ZEO servers distributed between our two Backends servers (6 each) with 400 ZODB mountpoints with its corresponding blobs, 36 Zope clients (12 Zope clients each Frontend) and 12 Varnish and HAProxy pairs in the Pre-frontends serving requests for 400 Plone sites.
I have detected lately some misunderstanding when people refers to different kind of software. The word Framework is honestly, largely overloaded. The confusion often reaches to the point of mistake a well known standard for a framework.
So, I’ll try to shed some light to this subject.
Obviously, let’s say we have an application that uses a framework or a library. I wanted to remark this, because a framework is nothing by itself and accomplish nothing. It seems a naive statement but it’s important when comparing a framework with an application (e.g. a content management system, CMS) that uses a framework for accomplish a task.
In essence, a library is a module, self contained piece of software that you call from your application code to accomplish a specific, well-defined operations. It usually exposes an API and its features are well documented.
On the other side, a framework calls your application code which is in fact, the meat that the framework needs to accomplish something specific. A framework embodies some abstract design, with more behavior built in. In order to use it you need to insert your behavior into various places in the framework either by subclassing or by plugging in your own classes. The framework’s code then calls your code at these points.
A framework may include libraries, support programs, a scripting language, or other software to help develop and glue together the different components of a software project. It usually packs the means to work with some software paradigms, for example model-view-controller (MVC) and provides the software components for accessing persistence layer, creating and manage the business logic and a template language to create views.
Let’s see an example. Any (decent) web framework have classes or methods that embodies the behavior of “a web view”. However, this behavior by itself does nothing because the view is empty. It knows it is a view… but with no purpose. Usually, you need to overload those classes or methods with your code to stuff your purpose and define what your views should accomplish.
Some library examples: jQuery, image manipulators, string utilities, etc.
El darrer 7 de maig va tindre lloc a la localitat australiana de Melbourne el Kubaroo Open 2011 de speedcubing. Pels qui no heu sentit mai a parlar d’aquesta activitat, speedcubing és l’acte de resoldre un cub de Rubik el més aviat possible. En aquest campionat, un noi de Melbourne de 15 anys, Feliks Zemdegs va establir un nou récord mundial en la modalitat 3x3x3, parant el crono en 6,24s. Podeu veure el moment en el següent vídeo.
Els speedcubers es basen en la memorització de l’estat del cub en el moment de resoldre’l i en la aplicació de mètodes i regles predefinides i estudiades sobre el cub. Aquests mètodes normalment consten d’una cadena d’accions que resulten en canvis de posició de les peces del cub. Alguns mètodes tenen més de 100 moviments i molts speedcubers memoritzen tots els moviments de varis métodes per tindre un repertori de moviments molt ampli per poder aplicar a fi de resoldre cada cub que se’ls hi presenta.
La fase de desenvolupament d’un projecte utilitzant metodologies àgils i resoldre un cub de Rubik no difereixen en gaire, de fet s’assemblen molt. Totes dues necessiten d’una primera fase d’estudi de la situació i identificació de les necessitats del problema a resoldre. Després, hi ha una fase iterativa en la que s’ataca el problema obtenint resultats parcials però funcionals, operatius i entregables. Es repeteix la iteració fins que s’obté el resultat esperat, la resolució del problema inicial.
Les metodologies àgils es caracteritzen per ser adaptatives a lo llarg del cicle de vida del desenvolupament del projecte. Cal remarcar que no són metodologies que tractin la gestió integral de projectes, si no que miren d’atacar amb efectivitat la fase de desenvolupament del projecte focalitzant-se en la comunicació i la satisfacció general del client. Són especialment apropiats pel desenvolupament de projectes en el que el client no disposa de requeriments gaire acurats ni d’una imatge cent per cent clara del resultat final de la solució. En aquesta situació normalment és molt complicat escriure un document extens dels requeriments del projecte tal i com es faria en cas d’utilitzar metodologies predictives. Els projectes de gestió de continguts web sovint cauen dins d’aquest escenari.
Scrum no és més que una de moltes metodologies àgils que s’han desenvolupat a lo llarg dels últims anys. Bàsicament compleix moltes de les característiques exposades en el Agile Manifesto, document que intenta condensar totes les bondats de les metodologies àgils. Els exposats a continuació són els principals objectius i característiques de les metodologies àgils:
Obtenir la satisfacció del client lliurant-li solucions parcials usables al seu problema de manera ràpida
Els canvis de requeriments són benvinguts, encara que ens trobem en una fase avançada de desenvolupament
El software es lliura de manera freqüent (setmanes i no mesos)
La quantitat de software funcionant i amb el beneplàcit del client és la principal mesura de progrés
Desenvolupament sostenible, capaç de mantenir un ritme constant
Cooperació i treball en grup diari entre les persones integrants de l’equip, tant comercials/gestors de client com desenvolupadors
La col·laboració cara a cara és la millor manera de comunicació
Els projectes es construeixen al voltant de persones motivades, en les quals recau la responsabilitat de l’èxit del projecte i com a tal, s’ha de confiar en ells
Atenció contínua a l’excel.lencia tècnica i el disseny de bon software
Equips que s’auto-organitzen
L’equip és capaç d’adaptar-se al canvi amb facilitat
Per aconseguir aquests objectius, Scrum proposa un procés base basat en iteracions, l’assignació de rols dins de l’equip i varis artefactes que serviran de suport per tot el procés. Aquestes són algunes de les seves claus:
Desenvolupament basat en iteracions del procés Scrum: planificació, desenvolupament, test, demo
A principi de cada iteració es decideix amb el client que funcionalitats són prioritàries i es planifiquen amb l’equip. Cada persona de l’equip s’encarrega d’una tasca i no agafa un altre fins que no l’acaba
Al final de cada iteració, es fa una demo al client amb el software funcionant fins ara i això li permet tindre petits tasts de la foto final, pot opinar i influir en els requeriments inicials i l’equip es realimenta de la seva opinió i visió del producte final
Cada dia es fa una trobada entre tots els membres de l’equip i es resolen tots els problemes o dubtes que han esdevingut en la jornada anterior i s’intenten resoldre el més aviat possible
L’equip te l’encàrrec de focalitzar-se en el desenvolupament del projecte i només en això, qualsevol interrupció externa es tracta convenientment per evitar que l’equip es descentri del seu objectiu principal
Es podrien omplir pàgines i pàgines sobre Scrum, però el verdader poder d’Scrum està en els resultats d’aplicar-lo: Satisfacció general del client durant tot el procés de desenvolupament del projecte conjuminat amb alta qualitat del software desenvolupat.
Per cert, el meu rècord en resoldre el cub de Rubik és 3m20s… i el vostre?
I consider that I belong to the Plone Community since my first attendance to my first Plone Conference in Seattle (2006). I’ve always wanted to contribute to the Plone community one way or another, however I’ve never found the right project nor the time to spend with a worthy contribution. I’ve been always attracted by the idea of writing a book, and when the opportunity of writing a Plone book came, I saw clearly that this was the right project to put my efforts on. However, I realized soon that writing a book it’s not a joke. It has a lot of work involved, deadlines to accomplish, endless work weekends, revisions, revisions, and more revisions… but the final result was worth the price paid. I want to thank to all the people that help me during this year to gave birth to this book.
Packt offered me to write a book about Plone-based intranets targeted to beginners and users with no previous experience about Plone who want to learn how to design, build, and deploy a reliable, full-featured, and secure intranet easily from scratch. It sounded very familiar to me because I have a great experience building intranets and collaboration sites for the university. I’ve tried to dump all the knowledge and experience I’ve acquired during the last 4 years working actively with Plone.
I hope I’ve succeeded in this effort and that you enjoy this book as much as I’ve enjoyed writing it.
These are some of the key topic covered by the book:
Get to grips with installing Plone and all its dependencies
Easily set up your Plone site and optimize it to work as an intranet
Manage users and groups, and use local and global roles to manage content access
Create and modify Plone workflows and learn how to use them
Explore the most common security use cases in an intranet and learn how to deal with them in Plone
Make effective use of content type and some of the out-of-the-box Plone features to work for your intranet
Enhance your intranet with useful add-on products, like corporate blogs, message boards, document preview helpers, and so on
Give a fresh, standing-out look to your intranet with attractive themes
Deploy your intranet and make your site live
This book is for anyone who needs to build an intranet with no limits on capabilities or features. Even if you don’t have previous CMS experience or programming skills, this book is for you. Targeted at beginners with no previous experience with Plone, this book will teach you step by step and at the end you should have a full-featured, reliable, and secure intranet.